<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarkCarras.com &#187; Fox News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markcarras.com/tag/fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markcarras.com</link>
	<description>Tech consultant for Olympia, Lacey, And Tumwater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When people who are still wrong say I told you so</title>
		<link>http://www.markcarras.com/2011/03/when-people-who-are-still-wrong-say-i-told-you-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markcarras.com/2011/03/when-people-who-are-still-wrong-say-i-told-you-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Carras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markcarras.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nothing more frustrating than when people who are still wrong say &#8220;I told you so.&#8221; Now I have this one friend who constantly tells me I should &#8216;cover bigger bands&#8217;. This is not what I am talking about really. Because that friend never gives enough details to make any sense anyways. What does ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_846" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-846" href="http://www.markcarras.com/2010/10/book-review-daemon-and-freedom-by-daniel-suarez/daemon/"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-846" title="Daemon" src="http://www.markcarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Daemon-150x150.jpg" alt="Daemon" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Daemon</p></div>
<p>There is nothing more frustrating than when people who are still wrong say &#8220;I told you so.&#8221; Now I have this one friend who constantly tells me I should &#8216;cover bigger bands&#8217;. This is not what I am talking about really. Because that friend never gives enough details to make any sense anyways. What does he mean by bigger? Bigger draw at venues? Bigger record sales? Bigger budgets spent to push them? Being on GMA? How much hype a band has means nothing. We all know that. I have seen bands with multimillion dollar budgets, appear on GMA, and then play to a half empty house at a 500 capacity club some Metal band packed two nights ago. That Metal band will never get on GMA. Hype means nothing. Record sales? This means nothing either anymore. The industry keeps a horrid record of such things so they can have a paper trail to prove why they don&#8217;t owe an artist. I could go on and on, but the truth is that telling someone like me they should cover bigger bands means nothing until you know enough about the industry to know what that means. The truth is that I have never rejected an interview because a band sold too many records. I never have an I never will.</p>
<p>Then there are people who have such wackado political ideas that you couldn&#8217;t do what they are calling you to do if you wanted to. It&#8217;s like the employee who tells a boss they are doing the wrong thing by closing shop after a business has failed. That employee doesn&#8217;t understand that their paycheck has to come from somewhere. They think that you have a choice to close the business or not. If the ledger doesn&#8217;t add up, it doesn&#8217;t add up. I have another friend who is against unions because some of his non-union friends don&#8217;t get paid as much as a union guy like me. I try to explain to him that the suits would love nothing more than to bring everyone down to that level, but the unions would rather bring every common worker up. Are you for the common worker or the suit trying to take advantage of said common worker? He can&#8217;t see that far. All he knows is that a friend isn&#8217;t making as much as another and it would be more fair if everyone got paid the same for the same work. He can&#8217;t comprehend paying everyone more. Only less.</p>
<p>Of course the knee jerk reaction argument that has been programmed into everyone&#8217;s head to that is that money doesn&#8217;t come out of nowhere. As I said before, if the ledger doesn&#8217;t add up, the ledger doesn&#8217;t add up. This has been a very impressive dupe. This is when bullshit is so stunning you have to stand in awe of the balls it takes for the suits to get the more gullible to believe it. While they buy their tenth vacation home, seventh yacht, and go on their 2nd monthly vacation, we work paycheck to paycheck cheering them on. No, this is not socialism I am pushing. What I am saying is that workers should get a living wage. Yes, we need some rich to fuel the dream so others are encouraged to work harder. But how rich do they need to be and how poor do we need to be. That is the question.</p>
<p>Pure Capitalism would destroy us. Pure Socialism would destroy us. It&#8217;s all about a balance between the two. Let&#8217;s say just as an example that a suit could gain one nice big yacht, a really nice vacation home, and two amazing vacations per year. This is way better than I will ever get in my life. But let&#8217;s say that if they cut down to that still extremely impressive lifestyle it would allow them to pay their grunt workers a livable wage. Is that socialism? No, because they are still annoyingly rich. We are still the grunts. Unions are not about paying an employee the most. They are about paying an employee the least amount possible to be considered fair. No one has ever made it rich being a union worker.</p>
<p>Yet, we still have the Glenn Beck fans, the Tea Party goofs, and the Rand Paul jokers saying &#8216;See I told you so.&#8217; about things that make even less sense on the ledger. The problem is that their followers are too short sighted to look at the big picture to add up all the math. Cheaper, cheaper, cheaper, just means jobs are sent over seas. Or would it be a good thing to have the working conditions of China here is the U.S.? The truth is that this subject can&#8217;t be thoroughly discussed in one blog post. Maybe an entire book. Even better so it would have to be a series of college classes. It would have to be a mixture of history and economics to totally encompass all that has to be looked at. Otherwise all we are doing is puking out talking points that don&#8217;t even graze the surface. So until then people like me will have to play the fool on the hill when you short sighted types say, &#8216;I told you so&#8217; without knowing how foolish you look with that foot in your mouth.</p>
<p>Can I ask you one favor? Please question your favorite news source. If your favorite news source calls into question all the third party (non-partisan) fact checking sites, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t trust them? If a news source is trying to make you think they are the only one true source run as fast as you can from them. Throughout history this always leads to some really scary stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markcarras.com/2011/03/when-people-who-are-still-wrong-say-i-told-you-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What destroys Braincells More?</title>
		<link>http://www.markcarras.com/2010/03/what-destroys-braincells-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markcarras.com/2010/03/what-destroys-braincells-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Carras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farmville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoarders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady GaGa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markcarras.com/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok people, I just have to do this. Now that we have some sort of health care reform, I think it is time we as Americans start working on mental health. We need to challenge our brains more. There are things we are doing that are making this country into dumber and dumber sheep everyday. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img alt="stupid" src="http://markcarras.com/images/demotivators/stupidbush.jpg" title="stupid" width="300" height="416" /><p class="wp-caption-text">stupid</p></div><P></p>
<p>Ok people, I just have to do this. Now that we have some sort of health care reform, I think it is time we as Americans start working on mental health. We need to challenge our brains more. There are things we are doing that are making this country into dumber and dumber sheep everyday. The problem is that these people can&#8217;t even be talked to. When you try to take heroin away from a junkie they will react violently. Sure it is bad for them. sure it is making them less healthy and more stupid. Of course the best thing you can do for them is to take away all their drugs and force them to get clean. But try to tell them that. They will go on full attack. </p>
<p>The same thing happens if you try to take away the things that help America unplug their brains. It is bringing this country down further and further. It needs to stop! So what do you think is hurting us the most? What is helping to drag the American people deeper into the gutter of ignorance more? What do you think is wiping the butt cheek of society with the American flag more? </p>
<p>Now if for even a second you feel like attacking me for this post, you are the problem! Stop lying to yourself and face the facts. Don&#8217;t try to say &#8220;Fans of ____ are not even near as bad as fans of _____!&#8221; You are all just as guilty. You do these things because it lets you unplug your brain. It lets you be stupid. Do you not see how that is a problem? Something that lets you be stupid is not a good thing. So if this fits you at all, please just stop it instead of attacking me for this blog post. You attack because you know I am right.<br />
<script src="http://twtpoll.com/js/badge.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
<script src="http://twtpoll.com/badge/?twt=hi4t1q&#038;b=1" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p><strong>When you all try to defend these things, i will know I have hit a nerve. So thanks for letting me know I am correct. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markcarras.com/2010/03/what-destroys-braincells-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The reason Rupert Murdoch might win the battle against Google</title>
		<link>http://www.markcarras.com/2009/11/the-reason-rupert-murdoch-might-win-the-battle-against-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markcarras.com/2009/11/the-reason-rupert-murdoch-might-win-the-battle-against-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Carras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markcarras.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason Rupert Murdoch might win the battle against Google There is one piece of information that I have yet to see in the debate over Rupert Murdoch pulling his content from Google. He own Fox news and they have an insanely huge pull with people. Fox news viewers are the worst of the right ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Rupert Murdoch might win the battle against Google</p>
<p>There is one piece of information that I have yet to see in the debate over <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/digital-media/6559694/Rupert-Murdoch-to-remove-News-Corps-content-from-Google-in-months.html">Rupert Murdoch pulling his content from Google</a>. He own Fox news and they <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/april_ratings_fnc_beats_cnn_and_msnbc_combined_115179.asp">have an insanely huge pull with people</a>. <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/politicolive/1009/Dunn_Fox_is_arm_of_Republican_Party.html">Fox news viewers are the worst of the right wing wackos</a>. These people do not think. They just do whatever the pundits at Fox news tell them to. The reason Bush was able to cause so much destruction is the same reason why Obama has had such a hard time fixing things. The right are kind of Borg like. The left will debate and scrutinize things until well after the proverbial bell has rung. Liberals (I&#8217;m a liberal myself) can&#8217;t get anything done because they can&#8217;t ban together as one. For the Dems it means nothing to have a majority because they won&#8217;t ban together on anything anyways. The right however will. They will do it every time without even thinking. This is why they always win when screwing over the American public and the Dems always loose when trying to fix things. </p>
<p>So back to the whole Rupert Murdoch thing, this is why he can win this. Notice what he has done to news? Gone are the days of the non-biased news anchor. Everything is either far right (Fox) or far left(MSNBC). A news network has no chance of ratings if they try to compete with silly things like journalistic integrity. That is a goofy pipe dream in today&#8217;s times. So now we have to depend on getting our news from search engines. Read from enough sources and you get an idea of where the truth might be. However, imagine if Rupert Murdoch used Fox news to make Bing the right wing search engine and Google had to become the left wing search engine to compete? This would make the news even more partisan then it is already! </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think he has the power to do this? Think again. We liberal douchebags don&#8217;t call them Fox News Zombies for nothing. As I have already said, Fox News viewers do not think. They let Bill O&#8217;Reilly do that for them. Imagine if Fox got their 7 million viewers to all switch their browser favorite to Bing and remove Google as their default search engine all at once. Imagine if they put up a link to the &#8220;<em>Bling add on</em>&#8221; right on the top of every page on the Fox News site. Fox can make Bling the default search engine for right wing wackos in a second. <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/cnn_ratings_down_fox_msnbc_gro.php">Don&#8217;t think they can&#8217;t</a> or you give them more power than they ever had before. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markcarras.com/2009/11/the-reason-rupert-murdoch-might-win-the-battle-against-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten new slogans for Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.markcarras.com/2009/04/top-ten-new-slogans-for-fox-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markcarras.com/2009/04/top-ten-new-slogans-for-fox-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Carras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Ten Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Colmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markcarras.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Ten new slogans for Fox News: 1. The darkest comedy channel on television 2. We can dish it out but we can&#8217;t take it 3. That was then&#8230;this is now 4. I have no recollection of ever saying that 5. If you thought we spun things before&#8230;you ain&#8217;t seen nothing yet! 6. We use ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Ten new slogans for Fox News:</p>
<p>1. The darkest comedy channel on television</p>
<p>2. We can dish it out but we can&#8217;t take it</p>
<p>3. That was then&#8230;this is now</p>
<p>4. I have no recollection of ever saying that</p>
<p>5. If you thought we spun things before&#8230;you ain&#8217;t seen nothing yet!</p>
<p>6. We use flash and flair to make racism purddy.</p>
<p>7. We got tea bagged by lack of research.</p>
<p>8. If you take us seriously, you ain&#8217;t paying attention. </p>
<p>9. Proof that being sore losers doesn&#8217;t make you a rebel.</p>
<p>10. Because Journalistic integrity is bad for business. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markcarras.com/2009/04/top-ten-new-slogans-for-fox-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

